<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spivak&#8217;s value</title>
	<link>http://recordingsurface.blogsome.com/2006/04/19/spivaks-value/</link>
	<description>Scratches, crackles, and interrupted takes</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Eric</title>
		<link>http://recordingsurface.blogsome.com/2006/04/19/spivaks-value/#comment-70</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:52:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://recordingsurface.blogsome.com/2006/04/19/spivaks-value/#comment-70</guid>
					<description>Jon--Thanks for noticing, cuz everything looked okay on the coding post, but some weird forces were at work. It's fixed now.

Nate and az--I'm glad you liked. Nate, I'm not sure that I can add anything too interesting just now. I'm trying to get some thoughts together on the recent actions surrounding the immigration legislation that would undoubtedly incorporate some of this stuff. Hopefully I can get to that soon. AZ, &quot;negation of the negation&quot; is super-inadequate, I guess you could say, and I also artfully elided a sentence in the middle of this snuck in the outside Third World, but I like that she hints at a way of not viewing division of labor as existing along national lines and that she foregrounds women's part in this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jon&#8211;Thanks for noticing, cuz everything looked okay on the coding post, but some weird forces were at work. It&#8217;s fixed now.</p>
	<p>Nate and az&#8211;I&#8217;m glad you liked. Nate, I&#8217;m not sure that I can add anything too interesting just now. I&#8217;m trying to get some thoughts together on the recent actions surrounding the immigration legislation that would undoubtedly incorporate some of this stuff. Hopefully I can get to that soon. AZ, &#8220;negation of the negation&#8221; is super-inadequate, I guess you could say, and I also artfully elided a sentence in the middle of this snuck in the outside Third World, but I like that she hints at a way of not viewing division of labor as existing along national lines and that she foregrounds women&#8217;s part in this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: az</title>
		<link>http://recordingsurface.blogsome.com/2006/04/19/spivaks-value/#comment-69</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:01:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://recordingsurface.blogsome.com/2006/04/19/spivaks-value/#comment-69</guid>
					<description>hey eric,

i really like this, especially the part about theorising value stuff in relation to movement on that plane that can't really be summarised by 'inside/outside'. and i was thinking about that long quote too (my post is on sunday, i think, so maybe i'll expand more on it then). i'm not sure that talking about it as a 'negation of the negation' quite covers all the bases, though. 

cheers, anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>hey eric,</p>
	<p>i really like this, especially the part about theorising value stuff in relation to movement on that plane that can&#8217;t really be summarised by &#8216;inside/outside&#8217;. and i was thinking about that long quote too (my post is on sunday, i think, so maybe i&#8217;ll expand more on it then). i&#8217;m not sure that talking about it as a &#8216;negation of the negation&#8217; quite covers all the bases, though. </p>
	<p>cheers, anyhow.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://recordingsurface.blogsome.com/2006/04/19/spivaks-value/#comment-68</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:31:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://recordingsurface.blogsome.com/2006/04/19/spivaks-value/#comment-68</guid>
					<description>Eric, 
I like what I take to be the spirit of your remarks on this, and some of Jon's elsewhere, a sort of bridge-building between ostensibly opposed/incompatible idioms. I also think that's a great and very useful type of intellectual work. So, please say more on the Spivak/D&amp;amp;G non-contradiction when you can. I'm not super fond of either at the moment, in part cuz I think I don't get it, but maybe seeing the not so obvious connections/similarities between the two could help me out.
take care,
Nate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Eric,<br />
I like what I take to be the spirit of your remarks on this, and some of Jon&#8217;s elsewhere, a sort of bridge-building between ostensibly opposed/incompatible idioms. I also think that&#8217;s a great and very useful type of intellectual work. So, please say more on the Spivak/D&amp;G non-contradiction when you can. I&#8217;m not super fond of either at the moment, in part cuz I think I don&#8217;t get it, but maybe seeing the not so obvious connections/similarities between the two could help me out.<br />
take care,<br />
Nate
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon</title>
		<link>http://recordingsurface.blogsome.com/2006/04/19/spivaks-value/#comment-67</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:05:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://recordingsurface.blogsome.com/2006/04/19/spivaks-value/#comment-67</guid>
					<description>&quot;(as well, perhaps, as the, ahem, discussion happening here and here)&quot;

NB two of these links are back to this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;(as well, perhaps, as the, ahem, discussion happening here and here)&#8221;</p>
	<p>NB two of these links are back to this post.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
